ruthbrarian’s avatarruthbrarian’s Twitter Archive—№ 6,106

            1. Slightly different context but this is part of why I almost never give stars on Goodreads. I occasionally will for some 5s and some 1s/2s (always with explanation). But normally I don't feel like my sense of liking a book fits into a star model. And who am I to affect starring? @QueenOfRats/1295027061694689282
          1. …in reply to @ruthbrarian
            The reason I sometimes give out 5s is that on occasion either a book really hits me, or I enjoy it an awful lot and I want to be sure it gets a good rating. But otherwise I just... don't????
        1. …in reply to @ruthbrarian
          Anyway, I don't think my "meh" on a book which I don't actually object to should lower that book's rating just because it was only 3-Ruth-stars when it might be just what someone else needs.
      1. …in reply to @ruthbrarian
        My 1-star reviews include such gems as: "Farnham's Freehold is racist, misogynistic trash." "You can't just call it 'Ivoory' and now it's space ivory, Barbara Hambly!" "This is a defense of the CIA and boy howdy it's a poor defense."
    1. …in reply to @ruthbrarian
      "when I’m reading a noir thriller the cozy interruption is like finding maple syrup in your spicy samosas. On the other hand? If you find noir to be a bit too heavy on the endings, you’ll probably find it a sweet treat at the end of a savory meal. Not my jam though."
  1. …in reply to @ruthbrarian
    and "this guy buys into the Chicago school and doesn't get that 'No Excuses' charter policies are extremely racist."